Richard Hirsh, Virginia Tech
“The Stormy Reception of Wind Turbines: Values, History, and the Poorly Articulated Reasons for Opposition to Wind-Energy Technology,” paper given at the Cultures of Energy 2nd Annual Spring Research Symposium, April 19–21, 2013
wind turbines sociological approach of value for nonacademics as well Carter era; big improvement in tech popular support for turbines often viewed as symbols of modernity Walmart; industrial sized wind turbines what’s the problem? the problem of locating somewhere in nature environmental reasons: avian, bat mortality; need for beefed-up transmission infrastructure, service roads in wilderness health and safety: low frequency sound, setback needs, shadow flicker economic: require subsidies, not cost-effective NIMBY
refutation: cats cause more bird deaths
counter refutation: pigeons different from rare species
prgoress; exploitation of rural folk by city dwellers (what’s new); big city lawyers and business people taking advantage by swaying policy; building them responds to big city demand; rural folk resent suffering risks etc
many people dislike their appearance; Lewis in Scotland. Robert Righter: winding roads, wooded hills, hedge-rows “render our ideal of an aesthetic landscape” giving the “illusion hat nature does the planning”
belief that’s it’s okay to industrialize already industrial cities
1930s electricity: tech in rural areas viewed as sign of progress
PIMBY: “Please in my back yard” <> midwestern farmers turbines as sophistication symbols, hi tech
>> decisions based on symbolic meaning, perceptions of “nature” and “harmony,” culture and values
visibility of turbines vs other elements of the electric system forces people to confront difficult choices
big concentrated power plants outside population centers put in middle of nowhere very few people know there is a power plant there
even physically visible things have become naturalized and invisible: cars, roads, municipal water supplies etc.
we notice them only when they break
Pasqualetti: such invisibility suggests that there are no consequences (out of sight, out of mind) we hardly know what electricity is (vs coal and wood you have to bring into house) we don’t know how much each appliance consumes; we have no economic or sensory connection
to duplicate a power plant you need an awful lot of wind turbines there must be some distance between them
>> social science needs to understand opposition to turbines
infrastructure tends to be hidden and invisible
Comments
Post a Comment